Monday, October 6, 2025

Survey Finds Workers Anticipate Delegating One-Third of Tasks to AI

Share

A recent survey reveals significant concerns among business workers about the accountability and reliability of AI agents in the workplace. Commissioned by Asana, a work management vendor, the survey included responses from 2,025 knowledge workers in the UK and US. As businesses rapidly embrace AI-driven initiatives, many are doing so without establishing essential governance frameworks and training processes, leaving employees uncertain about their role and responsibility.

The figures from the survey are striking: 77% of workers reported using AI agents in some capacity, with 76% viewing this technology as a fundamental shift in work methodology rather than merely another tool for productivity. However, workers are wary, with 62% describing AI agents as unreliable. This skepticism highlights the disconnect between enthusiasm for AI and the practical challenges of its deployment.

Mark Hoffman, Work Innovation Lead at the Asana Work Innovation Lab, emphasizes the concerns related to ownership and accountability. “Knowledge workers are worried about ownership. Ultimately, when an AI agent produces work, maybe at my command, do I still own that work?” he asks. Despite the enthusiasm for AI, a troubling 33% of respondents said they don’t know who should be held accountable when AI systems fail.

Small business owners should note that this uncertainty and lack of clear accountability could impact their decision to invest in AI technology. With 54% of workers indicating that AI can create more work by necessitating corrections, businesses might face unintended consequences of adopting these systems without adequate oversight.

While AI technology promises efficiency, the survey indicates that almost one-third of organizations allow employees to create AI agents without management approval. This lack of control can lead to increased ‘AI debt,’ defined as the accumulation of unproductive systems and practices brought on by poorly implemented technology. This situation is particularly critical for small businesses, where resources are typically limited, and mistakes can be costly.

Respondents also expressed the need for clearer boundaries, with 52% desiring their companies to define human versus AI responsibilities, and 56% advocating for formal usage guidelines. Providing clear parameters can help employees better understand how to integrate AI into their workflows while minimizing potential negative impacts.

The survey highlighted a skills gap that many businesses must address: the ability to effectively delegate tasks to AI. “One of the skills that people need to effectively use AI systems and AI agents is the skill of delegation," explains Hoffman. Many frontline workers, lacking managerial roles, struggle with this important skill. This gap can hinder a company’s ability to fully leverage AI’s capabilities, particularly in environments where rapid response and adaptability are essential.

Interestingly, workers who engage critically with AI—challenging the AI’s responses and asking for clarifications—tend to find more success with these technologies. Employers in small businesses should foster a culture of inquiry, encouraging employees to interact dynamically with AI systems, rather than passively accepting their outputs.

The most fruitful applications of AI, according to the survey, come from identifying and addressing workflow bottlenecks rather than using AI just to enhance individual productivity. “When deployed in that team-based mindset… [it] sees way higher success in implementation,” Hoffman notes. For small businesses, this team-centric approach allows for better alignment of AI capabilities with organizational goals.

The research source underscores the urgency for businesses to confront the operational implications of integrating AI agents. It is vital for organizations to establish robust governance frameworks, ensure proper training for their staff, and create a culture that embraces dynamic use of AI. Notably, only 38% of organizations have provided adequate training on AI, despite 82% of employees indicating its necessity.

As small businesses navigate this evolving landscape, they should weigh the benefits against the potential pitfalls. AI can offer significant advantages in efficiency and productivity, but without appropriate controls, training, and accountability structures in place, the risks can outweigh the rewards.

For more in-depth insights, refer to the original article here.

Image Via BizSugar

John Cook
John Cook
John Cook is a small business consultant and writer with expertise in management strategies, leadership development, and operational efficiency. With over 15 years of experience advising startups and established businesses, John has helped countless entrepreneurs streamline processes, improve team productivity, and drive sustainable growth. His insights on small business management have been featured in prominent publications, providing actionable tips for business owners. John’s passion for empowering entrepreneurs shines through his practical advice. When he's not sharing management strategies, John enjoys woodworking and exploring hiking trails with his dog.

Read More

Local News