Marymount Manhattan College (MMC) has reached a significant settlement, agreeing to pay $8,392,758.43 after admitting to misconduct related to its application for a Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) loan. This case highlights ongoing issues about eligibility misrepresentations in government relief programs, especially those designed to assist small businesses during the COVID-19 pandemic.
The PPP was introduced as a lifeline to help businesses endure the economic fallout from the pandemic. Nonprofit organizations, like 501(c)(3) entities, could apply for loans if they had 500 or fewer employees. However, MMC exceeded this threshold when applying in May 2020, employing over 800 full-time and part-time staff. The college falsely certified its eligibility, claiming an average of only 482 full-time equivalent employees on its loan application.
U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York, Jay Clayton, emphasized the importance of accountability in the disbursement of taxpayer funds. He stated, “The Paycheck Protection Program was established to ease financial and economic strain caused by the pandemic by providing businesses with forgivable loans. But too many applicants applied for and received taxpayer money that they had no right to receive." This sentiment reflects a critical concern for small business owners who play by the rules, highlighting the need for integrity in securing public funds.
The severity of the matter lies in the fact that MMC’s misrepresentation was known at the time of application. The appendix submitted with the PPP application included audited financial documents showcasing the truth about its employee size, yet the college misrepresented its numbers. This act constituted a violation of the False Claims Act, which protects against fraudulent claims against government funds. MMC had its loan of $6,555,592 approved and even applied for forgiveness, successfully securing forgiveness for over $6 million by June 2021, but only after misrepresenting its employee count again.
Amaleka McCall-Brathwaite, Special Agent in Charge of the SBA Office of Inspector General, stated, “Entities that misrepresented their eligibility to obtain funds from SBA programs intended to support small businesses undermined the integrity of these critical relief efforts.” The implications for small business owners are profound. The case serves as a reminder of the importance of transparency and accuracy in any dealings with government funding. Misrepresentations can lead to severe penalties and legal challenges.
For small business owners, the fallout from such cases extends beyond legal implications. Trust in governmental relief programs could wane as accountability measures take center stage. Business owners must remain cautious and well-informed, ensuring they meet eligibility criteria to avoid potential pitfalls in securing support.
This settlement also brings to light the importance of accurate record-keeping. MMC’s appendix included detailed financial statements and payroll records, highlighting the need for thorough documentation in any funding application. Small businesses should take heed and ensure that their records accurately reflect their eligibility for programs like the PPP as they seek financial assistance.
While the closure of this case provides a sense of resolution, it also serves as a cautionary tale. Small business owners looking to navigate governmental relief efforts must remain vigilant to prevent similar missteps. The regulatory landscape is under scrutiny as governmental bodies, such as the SBA, ramp up efforts to weed out fraud and maintain the integrity of vital relief programs.
For more information about the settlement and detailed insights on government funding, visit the original post by the U.S. Small Business Administration here.
Image Via BizSugar
 loans. Learn about the details behind the settlement and its implications for the institution.){kind=link}